Some of the contents of the pages on this site are Copyright © 2016 NJH Music | [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Introductions and Reflections
Greetings, Brass-bandophiles! First of all, the introduction. My name is Dan Gordon, and I play Eb Bass with the Kensington & Norwood City Band in Adelaide, South Australia. Whilst these days I earn a living as a jazz double bass player, I still play with the band (brass bands are a bit like herpes - hard to shake). I've been tossing these thoughts around in my mind for some time - perhaps some of you folk have an opinion: I've been exposed to most sides of music, and played with all manner of different ensembles: brass bands, jazz bands, orchestras, big bands, chamber ensembles, rock bands, country bands, you name it, I've done it at some time or other. Each genre tends to have attached to it its own particular outlook, its own perception of music as a whole. The brass band, though, seems to be something particularly unique, and I don't mean that in a completely positive way. First, the good points: brass bands tend to be made up almost entirely of people who want to be there, who enjoy getting together and making music and who do so for little return other than personal satisfaction and a sense of belonging. From this motivation springs a refreshingly honest and unpretentious form of music making. There tends to be none of the professional-type corruption which tends to work its way into even the most amateur of orchestras. The sound, too is uniquely beautiful, at least to those of us who were enraptured early! But there are some things that bother me about the brass band movement as a whole. There are a few things which seem to be endemic to brass-banding which are anti-musical. That is to say, they actively discourage the making of music in a meaningful way. The first of these is competition. Now competition is unmusical full-stop, the awarding of marks to a musical performance is a contradiction in itself, and does the beauty of the music a great injustice, but the particular way that the brass band world has of treating competitions seems to make the situation worse. There seems to be an endless comparing of marks, as though they are any indication of the actual merit of the performance, the musicality of the performance, the capacity of the performance to move its audience, to invigorate them, excite them, sadden them, give them a greater sense of being human. How can we quantify these qualities with a few marks, but even having done so because of the practicalities of competition, how can we credit these marks with anything other than the most arbitary importance? This brings me to my second point: The fact that brass bands seem to have no other means apart from competition by which to assess their standard, and no other forums apart from competition in which to play the serious, exciting music which I believe shows a brass band at its magnificent best. How many people outside of the brass band "movement" are even aware of the existence of music like Bourgeois' "Blitz", Gregson's "Dances and Arias", Sparke's "Aoteoroa" (insert your favourite test piece here)? Almost everyone I have spoken to in the greater musical world sees a brass band as a vehicle for playing hymns and marches, maybe the occasional watery pop arrangement in the park on a sunday afternoon. And, to be honest, there aren't many bands working very hard to dispel this image. There are very few brass bands willing to stand up and be counted in the world of music as genuine ensembles, deserving of as much credibility as a chamber orchestra or a string quartet. They seem to prefer the cosy confines of the brass band movement, where the only thing they have to worry about are the points on the adjudicator's sheet. A fairly lengthy post by the standards of this list, but I would be interested to hear any responses. Cheers. Dan Gordon Adelaide, South Australia.
|
[Services] [Contact Us] [Advertise with us] [About] [Tell a friend about us] [Copyright © 2016 NJH Music] |