Some of the contents of the pages on this site are Copyright © 2016 NJH Music | [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: Conical?
John Aren wrote: > Confession is good for the soul! I've been telling audience for 20 > years that our (SMALL BORE) tenor trombones are the only non-conical > instruments in the band and that's how they keep there cutting edge. > But honestly now, as I look at the Trombone's taper, what is, where is > the difference between that and my Eb Tenor horn? In short, are we > still correct with this discussion? What makes a horn conical? > Signed, > Bewildered Dear Bewildered, Nothing's ever black and white - yes, a trombone is "more cylindrical" than the saxhorns, but each has a necessarily cylindrical section. In the case of the trombone, this has to be at least the (doubled) length of the slide. When valves are down on a valved instrument, then there will be a cylindrical section through the valve slides - but when played "open", only a tiny amount will be cylindrical. I'm not sure of the figures, but cornet/tenor horn/baritone will be "less conical" than flugel/euphonium/bass. So, yes, there'll be a bigger "bite" - but I'm sure some of the extra edge is because the trombone is the only band instrument at its pitch to have a horizontally-pointing bell. Ian -- I am confident this explanation will dispell any feelings of certainty that may have been troubling you. - BWHOLMES@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Cabbage) in <9601221753.AA27669@spock> -- unsubscribe or receive the list in digest form, mail a message of 'help' to listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
[Services] [Contact Us] [Advertise with us] [About] [Tell a friend about us] [Copyright © 2016 NJH Music] |