Brass Band Logo

NJH Music Logo

Some of the contents of the pages on this site are Copyright © 2016 NJH Music


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Vibrato (was Re: The ISB)



Kristopher Richardson u wrote:
> 
> (snip)
> listen to the ISB over some competition bands because they don't have an
> excessive amount of vibrato!  Could someone explain why European bands
> have so much vibrato!  I realize that it is traditional, but I think
> there would be greater demand if they caught up with the times,
> especially with orchestral players!  I go to school for music and study
> trumpet.  I usually introduce brass banding to my peers!  The first thing
> they mention is the vibrato!  It could be executed a little more tastefully,
> as it is an essential part of being musical.  All they need to do is slow
> it down a bit!  This is however just my opinion!
> 
>		 Kris
> 
> 

Ah, a vibrato thread. It would be good to get some opinions out on this
most contentious of issues. 

Seems to me that vibrato is a matter of very personal taste. I always
find it more than a little ironic that many orchestral players (of all
insruments) deride brass bands for their vibrato - yet the string
players play *everything* with vibrato! (And that's personal taste too,
not a global given. When McCartney and the Beatles recorded "Yesterday",
they used a string quartet. To get the sound he wanted, McCartney
insisted the string players use no vibrato. They complied, but were very
upset about it.)

To me, a euphonium played totally straight, without any vibrato, sounds
like something floating down the Thames (and this is not a complimentary
comparison). On the other hand, several trumpet players from the top
ranks of the supposedly vibrato-averse orchestral world use (or used -
the guys I'm thinking about have since retired - or were retired) a very
unpleasant form of vibrato (to my ears, that is - I have participated in
heated cyber-debate over the musical merits of one of these gentlemen).

Seems to me that one's perspective on vibrato has a lot to do with
preconceived notions of the functions of brass tone, and the context of
the music. If you're used to hearing brass in an orchestral context,
where heavy vibrato is often muscially inappropriate, there's a danger
of mapping this preconceived notion of brass sound onto other musical
contexts: to wit, brass bands. If you take an orchestral piece, and
transcribe it for brass band, what happens? The orchestral arrangement
is played by violins using vibrato - translate to brass band, and the
cornets need to sound like violins (warm, with vibrato), not trumpets.
(If someone wants to open up the tangent on the merits or otherwise of
orchestral transcriptions, that's a whole 'nother thread - and might be
an interesting one.) Are the vibrato-averse telling us that vibrato is
okay for violins, but not for cornets, *on the same piece of music* ???

One last observation before I bring this ramble to an end: American
brass players tend to think British bands use too much vibrato; British
brass band players hear American brass bands as having no warmth, no
soul (because their sound is so straight). It's the personal taste thing
again.

Bill Buffam


--
unsubscribe or receive the list in digest form, mail a message of 'help' to
listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Services] [Contact Us] [Advertise with us] [About] [Tell a friend about us] [Copyright © 2016 NJH Music]