Some of the contents of the pages on this site are Copyright © 2016 NJH Music | [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Arranging - Copyright
I have been arranging now for more than 40 years. Most of my work has been done for phonograph reproduction and broadcasting in the UK and other countries. In all that time, I have never had the need to gain permission from the copyright owners to make arrangements of their works. It seems that as long as the owner is receiving PRS and MCPS royalyies from my work, they are quite happy. I have even been successful on occasion, in persuading various publishing houses to contribute towards the cost of the arrangement. Publishing is another matter. It seems that the copyright owner requires a commission on every piece of music sold, as well as the performance royalties that the music might generate. That is fair enough, but just try to get permission to arrange or sub-publish their copyright. The answer is usually a flat "NO", or an exorbitant advance on royalties, or reference to another larger publishing house who has been given the sole rights to sub-publish their work. Sometimes, they do not even have the courtesy to reply to your request. If you offer your arrangement to one of those larger sub-publishers, they will probably tell you that they already have an arrangement of that title, or offer you a buy-out fee well below the Musicians' Union scale for arranging and part preparation. It is in this area I think, that the copyright owners need to lighten up, especially in the Brass Band World. It seems that every band has to play the same arrangement of a particular title, simply because that is the only score available. It discourages budding young arrangers from writing for the brass band, for fear of suffering heavy financial penalties. It also discourages bands from seeking out their favourite arrangers in order to attain a level of originality. I have often been told by bands that they much prefer my arrangement to the one they have just bought from the publisher, but they have to use the published version. That's the rules! It is obvious that composers need to protect their work, but this could easily be solved by setting up a collection agency similar to the PRS, to which every arranger or arranger/publisher should be registered. Royalties on music sales could then be collected either from the vendor or the purchaser and the proceeds directed towards the composer. Personally, I think that the arranger should also receive a proportion of the performance royalty. After all it IS the arrangement that sells the composition. As the situation stands, everyone looses out. The arranger is unable to find an outlet for his talent. The band is unable to procure the arrangement it wants. And above all, the composer is being denied the opportunity of having first-rate arrangements and varied styles of his work made, thereby generating more performance revenue for him/herself. The whole music industry is being strangled through over-protectionism! Adrian -- ____ _ _ / \ _| (_)___ _____ ADRIAN DROVER | () / _ | / _ \_( ___/ INNOVATIVE ORCHESTRAL SERVICES |__/\__\___|_\___/____) http://www.argonet.co.uk/users/adios/ mailto business: adios@xxxxxxxxxxxxx mailto personal: bossanova@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Glasgow, Scotland) -- unsubscribe or receive the list in digest form, mail a message of 'help' to listserver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
[Services] [Contact Us] [Advertise with us] [About] [Tell a friend about us] [Copyright © 2016 NJH Music] |