Some of the contents of the pages on this site are Copyright © 2016 NJH Music | [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: Arranging - Copyright
Hooray - some common sense at last. ---------- > From: Adrian Drover (Brass Band List <saxhorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: brass-band@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Arranging - Copyright > Date: 17 September 1997 01:00 > > I have been arranging now for more than 40 years. Most of my work has been done > for phonograph reproduction and broadcasting in the UK and other countries. In > all that time, I have never had the need to gain permission from the copyright > owners to make arrangements of their works. It seems that as long as the owner > is receiving PRS and MCPS royalyies from my work, they are quite happy. I have > even been successful on occasion, in persuading various publishing houses to > contribute towards the cost of the arrangement. > > Publishing is another matter. It seems that the copyright owner requires a > commission on every piece of music sold, as well as the performance royalties > that the music might generate. That is fair enough, but just try to get > permission to arrange or sub-publish their copyright. The answer is usually a > flat "NO", or an exorbitant advance on royalties, or reference to another > larger publishing house who has been given the sole rights to sub-publish their > work. Sometimes, they do not even have the courtesy to reply to your request. > If you offer your arrangement to one of those larger sub-publishers, they will > probably tell you that they already have an arrangement of that title, or offer > you a buy-out fee well below the Musicians' Union scale for arranging and part > preparation. > > It is in this area I think, that the copyright owners need to lighten up, > especially in the Brass Band World. It seems that every band has to play the > same arrangement of a particular title, simply because that is the only score > available. It discourages budding young arrangers from writing for the brass > band, for fear of suffering heavy financial penalties. It also discourages > bands from seeking out their favourite arrangers in order to attain a level of > originality. I have often been told by bands that they much prefer my > arrangement to the one they have just bought from the publisher, but they have > to use the published version. That's the rules! > > It is obvious that composers need to protect their work, but this could easily > be solved by setting up a collection agency similar to the PRS, to which every > arranger or arranger/publisher should be registered. Royalties on music sales > could then be collected either from the vendor or the purchaser and the > proceeds directed towards the composer. Personally, I think that the arranger > should also receive a proportion of the performance royalty. After all it IS > the arrangement that sells the composition. > > As the situation stands, everyone looses out. The arranger is unable to find an > outlet for his talent. The band is unable to procure the arrangement it wants. > And above all, the composer is being denied the opportunity of having > first-rate arrangements and varied styles of his work made, thereby generating > more performance revenue for him/herself. The whole music industry is being > strangled through over-protectionism! > > Adrian > -- > ____ _ _ > / \ _| (_)___ _____ ADRIAN DROVER > | () / _ | / _ \_( ___/ INNOVATIVE ORCHESTRAL SERVICES > |__/\__\___|_\___/____) http://www.argonet.co.uk/users/adios/ > mailto business: adios@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > mailto personal: bossanova@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Glasgow, Scotland) > > > -- > unsubscribe or receive the list in digest form, mail a message of 'help' to > listserver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- unsubscribe or receive the list in digest form, mail a message of 'help' to listserver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
[Services] [Contact Us] [Advertise with us] [About] [Tell a friend about us] [Copyright © 2016 NJH Music] |