Some of the contents of the pages on this site are Copyright © 2016 NJH Music | [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: Top 50
tim, like i said, computer generated statistics are meaningless, thanks for helping me make my point. Q.E.D! jim britcliffe united co-op band (crewe) In a message dated 24/10/1997 18:45:46, you write: << The important thing to remember about this list is that is based purely on contest results. I think the system is based on the same formula for calculating professional golf rankings and each band has a certain number of ranking points each month, which are derived from contest results over a rolling 3 year period. POints are allocated using a very complex system taking into account strength of field, number of bands, etc. Most recently, Wingates came 2nd (this in itself is probably responsible for a huge jump up the table) at the All England Masters, Dyke didn't play. The Open was postponed this year which gave all Open bands a disadvantage. It's part of the old question again - contests versus concerts. Statistically, between October 1994 and October 1997, Wingates have had more contest successes than Black Dyke, therefore they are higher than them in the table. Dyke do not enter many contests, therefore despite the fact that they are the most famous band in the world, they will never feature particularly highly in the rankings, unless they do something really spectacular like taking the Grand Slam as they did in 95 To save argument, look at it like this. Instead of saying 'Dyke are the 9th best band in the country' say 'Dyke has the 9th best record of contest results over the last 3 years in the country'. Even though it's a bit of a mouthful. -- Tim Morgan, Bass Trombone, Woolley Pritchard Sovereign Brass. >> -- unsubscribe or receive the list in digest form, mail a message of 'help' to listserver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
[Services] [Contact Us] [Advertise with us] [About] [Tell a friend about us] [Copyright © 2016 NJH Music] |