Some of the contents of the pages on this site are Copyright © 2016 NJH Music | [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Allowing professional players in brassbands
Dear listmember, I would like to (re)open the discussion about allowing professional players in a brassband. Nowadays, professional players are not allowed to enter the Belgian national brassband championship. Professional players are more or less defined as players who earn their money from joining a professional orchestra or from teaching brass in a music-academy, regardless the instrument. E.g. a trumpet player from a registered Belgian symphonic orchestra is not allowed to play cornet in a band, nor can he play trombone. Not even a professional violin player or singer would be allowed to play say bass tuba. A prof is only allowed if he/she once started as an amateur and as such registered during at least 5 consecutive years with the same band. If he/she changes from band he/she starts again from zero. Profs were allowed some 20 years ago when the bandmovement started in Belgium . However, in that time bands hired professional players just for the contest because their own players were not good enough, or they did not have enough players and so on. The bands with the best relations, the highest bid and so on,... won the contest. This was indeed quite unfair to bands who tried their best with their own *weak* players. To prevent this, different rules were set. After 20 years we still have the same rules although by the time the whole movement has been improved in all standards (thanks God). The rule has quite some disadvantages, e.g.: 1. we have to refuse professional players who would like to play with us. They don*t want any money (at the end, we are not sponsored), they just like to play brassband and enjoy it as an amateur. 2. If an amateur becomes prof after say 5 years, he/she can not switch anymore although having good reasons like: the band does not exist anymore, he/she has problems with the conductor or vice-versa, it is not interesting anymore to play for that band and so on. So, players are condemned to play for one band or to leave the movement 3. We see some bands now start to pay amateur-players. At the end what is the difference with paying a prof or is non-paid prof not better then a paid amateur? On the other hand, it also has its benefits: 1. the level of amateur playing is forced to increase. Meanwhile, the Belgian movement has evolved to a level professional players are not always improving the result surely not if they just come for one rehearsal and a concert/con= test, on the contrary. Belgian Brassband Willebroek took the European brassband title in Plymouth in 1993. I was playing with Willebroek in that time already for 9 years and I can state 100 % of the players were own amateur players, all playing at least during 2 years with the band. 2. Brassbands are trying to attract youth-players early to play brassband, they start up youth bands,... 3. Contests are quite fair and bands show up with their own players. A band on the contest is the same as after the contest. I guess the Belgian federation scares history will repeat itself and bands still need to be protected against themselves. Although I do not really know about their specific arrangements I guess the most actual example in the UK is the *use* of Roger Webster and Steven Mead in CWS Glasgow. Also not so long ago the UK changed its rules to allow professiona= l players. What are yor experiences, pros and contras with allowing professional players? Should Belgium adapt its rules? In which way and why (not)? What are the rules in your country, did they evolve from a similar situation and is the situation better now then before? Thanks for any reaction. Regards, Edy Van Asch Tenor Horn Metropole Brass Band -- unsubscribe or receive the list in digest form, mail a message of 'help' to listserver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
[Services] [Contact Us] [Advertise with us] [About] [Tell a friend about us] [Copyright © 2016 NJH Music] |