Some of the contents of the pages on this site are Copyright © 2016 NJH Music | [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: Adjudication correct?
On Mon, 9 Mar 1998, Krismleech wrote: > James Scott adjudicated the section at Nottingham, and it may seem that his > views, and resulting allocation of points, were very narrow minded. > Am I wrong or is technical quality more important nowadays than a > musical quality? The adjudicator's opinion of what is musical may differ from yours (or that of your conductor). When City of Oxford competed at the First Section National Finals last year, our conductor "misinterpreted" the second movement of the test-piece (James Curnow's "Sinfonietta" - yuk!). That is, the adjudicator didn't like the way we chose to play it. Our conductor thought that we played it more musically than many of the other bands by maintaining a constant rhythm throughout. The adjudicator (I think it was one of the Childs brothers) disagreed. At the end of the day, the results of a brass band contest are the opinions of one man on one day. What he sees as musical may depend on how many eggs he has for breakfast on the day of the contest... As far as James Scott goes, I find it hard to believe that he is obsessed with technicality over musicality. He has been around for a long time, and I think he probably listened out for the musical aspects (including tone, band sound, expression etc.) at least as much as the technical aspects of the test-piece. Regards, Cameron -- Cameron Mabon (International Idiot) cmabon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Piano, cornet and duck-call Fundamental Brass http://users.ox.ac.uk/~newc0349/fun City of Oxford Band http://www.jesus.ox.ac.uk/~cmabon/COSB.html -- unsubscribe or receive the list in digest form, mail a message of 'help' to listserver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
[Services] [Contact Us] [Advertise with us] [About] [Tell a friend about us] [Copyright © 2016 NJH Music] |