[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re re: Adjudication correct? Cheers Norm!

To: brass-band@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re re: Adjudication correct? Cheers Norm!
From: Krismleech <Krismleech@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1998 16:30:33 EST
Priority: low
Reply-to: brass-band@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

When I wrote the mail to the list it was merely a catalogue of my opinions,
and it was stated as being such. So why, Norm Harris, did you see it necessary
to reply in such a personal and arrogant manner. 

You say my criticism lacks substantiation... in case you didn't spot it, no
where in my posting did I say anything without using the words "in my opinion"
or "it seems" or "it may be", etc.   I also stated that I would also have been
disgruntled if we had WON under conditions such as these, 'cos it simply came
across as being narrow minded adjudication.

Next time you attempt to slate me, please at least read my mail correctly and
understand the intended message contained within the content, and that brings
me back to James Scott!!

Bye,   :))

Kris


--
unsubscribe or receive the list in digest form, mail a message of 'help' to
listserver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Follow-Ups:
- Adjudication correct? Cheers Norm!
  - From: Norm Harris
- Re: Re re: Adjudication correct? Cheers Norm!
  - From: Peter Younghusband

Prev by Date: Re: More ....... Re: DOYEN's Website
Next by Date: Wooden mouthpieces
Previous by thread: Re: More ....... Re: DOYEN's Website
Next by thread: Re: Re re: Adjudication correct? Cheers Norm!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread