[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re re: Adjudication correct? Cheers Norm!

To: brass-band@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Re re: Adjudication correct? Cheers Norm!
From: Peter Younghusband <monkey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 1998 16:53:42 +0800
Priority: low
References: <457c8832.3505b0fb@aol.com>
Reply-to: brass-band@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Well said!

Monkey


Krismleech wrote:

> When I wrote the mail to the list it was merely a catalogue of my opinions,
> and it was stated as being such. So why, Norm Harris, did you see it necessary
> to reply in such a personal and arrogant manner.
>
> You say my criticism lacks substantiation... in case you didn't spot it, no
> where in my posting did I say anything without using the words "in my opinion"
> or "it seems" or "it may be", etc.   I also stated that I would also have been
> disgruntled if we had WON under conditions such as these, 'cos it simply came
> across as being narrow minded adjudication.
>
> Next time you attempt to slate me, please at least read my mail correctly and
> understand the intended message contained within the content, and that brings
> me back to James Scott!!
>
> Bye,   :))
>
> Kris
>
> --
> unsubscribe or receive the list in digest form, mail a message of 'help' to
> listserver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


--
unsubscribe or receive the list in digest form, mail a message of 'help' to
listserver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

References:
- Re re: Adjudication correct? Cheers Norm!
  - From: Krismleech

Prev by Date: Re: More ....... Re: DOYEN's Website
Next by Date: Re: Adjudication correct?
Previous by thread: Re re: Adjudication correct? Cheers Norm!
Next by thread: Adjudication correct? Cheers Norm!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread