[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Contesting - Was: Re: Adjudication Correct?

To: brass-band@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Contesting - Was: Re: Adjudication Correct?
From: Noel Hunt <andnoelhunt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 1998 20:37:52 +1100
Priority: low
References: <Pine.3.07.9803140732.A14718-a100000@login> <350B0901.CA44FBC2@chesco.com>
Reply-to: brass-band@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Bill
All three of them got it wrong?  Gee, why do the organizers employ such clowns?

Noel Hunt

Bill Buffam wrote:

> Michael Solms wrote:
> >  At the North American championships we have three
> > adjudicators whose scores are totaled to determine the final rankings....
> >  It does seem that multiple adjudicators would give a fairer
> > result.  Was this tried and rejected in the U.K?
> >
>
> I have only attended one NABBA contest (1993), and for my money the 3
> judges got it way wrong. One judge was English, one American, and I
> don't remember who the other guy was. IMHO, this was the worst piece of
> adjudication I'd heard since the 1964 (Lorenzo) shambles in the British
> Open. Just my $0.02 worth.
>
> Bill Buffam


--
unsubscribe or receive the list in digest form, mail a message of 'help' to
listserver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Contesting - Was: Re: Adjudication Correct?
  - From: Bill Buffam

References:
- Re: Contesting - Was: Re: Adjudication Correct?
  - From: Michael Solms
- Re: Contesting - Was: Re: Adjudication Correct?
  - From: Bill Buffam

Prev by Date: En Aranjues Con Tu Amor
Next by Date: News from the Horne household
Previous by thread: Re: Contesting - Was: Re: Adjudication Correct?
Next by thread: Re: Contesting - Was: Re: Adjudication Correct?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread