[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: protest

To: brass-band@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: protest
From: Tony Lashmar <cornet@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 1998 12:01:17 +1000
Priority: low
References: <199804170010.KAA24267@mordred.castle.net.au>
Reply-to: brass-band@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Ron Grice wrote:

> : Tony Lashmar wrote
> >
> > Hawthorne broke a rule (quite blatantly if I may say so) and were caught.
>  The
> > imported player had not been in the country for the minimum peroid and
> was not
> > intending to stay for the minimum period........Sorry guys.......rules
> are
> > rules..........
>
> The rule or Regulations as they are now called ie.21 talks of registration
> with the band at least 42 days before the contest Reg 22 seems to me to be
> referring to a professional muscian  reg' for 12 months and played at least
> 60% of the bands engagements.   Which regulation are you referring to in
> the above comment Tony?

Oooooppppsss.....I was referring to reg 45I..but that deals with permit
players.....you are right it was all about reg 21,22

> Also one of the protesting bands ( I heard ) last year delberatly played a
> March that did not conform to the contest guidelines , was warned not to
> play it but did. Apparently no band protested and the incident was swept
> under the carpet. Surely the governing body's have a responsibility to
> enforce rules/reg when they are aware that reg's are not followed. I also
> wonder if your band protested at the Melbourne incident and if so why no
> protest at Newcastle?

I strongly agree.....but this time it was blatantly obvious to all...........

> Ron Grice.

Tony


--
unsubscribe or receive the list in digest form, mail a message of 'help' to
listserver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

References:
- Re: protest
  - From: Ron Grice

Prev by Date: Re: alternative instrument for a horn player
Next by Date: Re: protest
Previous by thread: Re: protest
Next by thread: Re: protest
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread