[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FLUGEL, not flugal

To: "'brass-band@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <brass-band@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: FLUGEL, not flugal
From: Adrian Drover <saxhorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 1998 08:43:24 +0100
In-reply-to: <D76D503DE976D1119C7E00A0C944D87532F7A6@RSYS002A>
Priority: low
Reply-to: brass-band@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On 23 Apr, "Reilly, Nick" <nick.reilly@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Isn't calling it a flugal instead of flugel just going the same way as
> the repiano cornet which is just a corruption of ripieno?
> At this rate, brass band players will end up with new names for every
> instrument that no-one else understands (in addition to all the names
> the bass trombonist gets called anyway :-) ).

Hope that doesn't include the Kornetts, Barrytones, Youfoniums and
Tyoobahs.

Adrian :-)

-- 
  ____    _ _
 /    \ _| (_)___   _____ ADRIAN DROVER 
|  ()  / _ | / _ \_( ___/ INNOVATIVE ORCHESTRAL SERVICES
|__/\__\___|_\___/____)   http://www.gemscore.demon.co.uk/   
Business:  adios@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx		     
Personal: adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  (Glasgow, Scotland)


--
unsubscribe or receive the list in digest form, mail a message of 'help' to
listserver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Follow-Ups:
- Re: FLUGEL, not flugal
  - From: Alastair Wheeler

References:
- RE: FLUGEL, not flugal
  - From: Reilly, Nick

Prev by Date: AW: FLUGEL, not flugal
Next by Date: Re: Where should the flugel sit?
Previous by thread: RE: FLUGEL, not flugal
Next by thread: Re: FLUGEL, not flugal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread