Some of the contents of the pages on this site are Copyright © 2016 NJH Music | [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Necessity of a 4th trombone
Lately I noticed many comments that said adding a 4th trombone would be a way to even out the balance and make scoring easier for the section. the logic being there was an uneven number of trombones, and a 4th would make mathematical and musical sense. In my admittedely short brass band experience, I have been taught that the bass trombone, while of course being a trombone, was closer to being an extension of the bass section. It was ment to add definition and sharpness to the tuba tone, and was to be the only true "edge" instrument in the brass band, and occasionally coupling up with the rest of the trombones. By that logic, the tenor trmobones would work out as being two (like the baritones) and the bass trombone would serve as the bridge from the tenor register (euphos and tenor trombones), same as the two baritones bridge the gap from the tenor horns and the low brass. To score a fourth trombone would throw the equation out of whack, unless you were crazy enough to score for two bass trombones to even them up with the baritones (dear lord, who would score for two bass trombones??? :) Comments? Adrian, anyone else? Regards, Matt LaFontaine Varsity All Star Brass Band '96 2nd Euphonium The All Star Brass and Percussion '97 1st Baritone '98 Solo Euphonium NABBA XVI Youth Solo Champion, Youth Ensemble Champion -- unsubscribe or receive the list in digest form, mail a message of 'help' to listserver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
[Services] [Contact Us] [Advertise with us] [About] [Tell a friend about us] [Copyright © 2016 NJH Music] |