[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Masters Result - Amazing Facts

To: brass-band@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Masters Result - Amazing Facts
From: Peter Younghusband <monkey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 May 1998 22:09:44 +0800
Priority: low
References: <199805241914.UAA12584@boober.lineone.net> <3568ac1f.380172@post.demon.co.uk>
Reply-to: brass-band@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Can somebody enlighten me as to how the placings were collated?

Was it a case of 1 point for a 1st, 2 for a 2nd etc.....lowest score wins?

Seems as though a few cats have been placed in amongst the aviary again!

Monkey



Simon Stonehouse wrote:

> On Sun, 24 May 1998 20:08:15 +0100, you wrote:
>
> >Hi again
> >
> >I've just found out some amazing details.
> >
> >NSK Ransomes were overall -12th.
> >
> >Of the three adjudicators G Brand had them 1st, another had them last
> >(21st) and the other 17th.
> >
> >Fodens had 2nd, 2nd and 8th. Ended up 6th.
> >
> i would guess that last fact can not be true......
>
> ybs 2 x1st, 1 x13th?
>
> Fairey's 2 x 2nd, 1x7th
>
> B&R 2 X 3rd, 1x4th
>
> thats how i understand it....so far!!
>
> S
>
> --
> unsubscribe or receive the list in digest form, mail a message of 'help' to
> listserver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


--
unsubscribe or receive the list in digest form, mail a message of 'help' to
listserver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

References:
- Masters Result - Amazing Facts
  - From: JEREMY P WISE
- Re: Masters Result - Amazing Facts
  - From: Simon Stonehouse

Prev by Date: Compere
Next by Date: Re: Masters Result - Amazing Facts
Previous by thread: Re: Masters Result - Amazing Facts
Next by thread: RE: Masters Result - Amazing Facts
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread