Some of the contents of the pages on this site are Copyright © 2016 NJH Music | [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: Full Masters Results - correct this time.(I hope)
IF you look at the placings/ ratings/ rankings given by the adj's, given that they concur within + / - 2 in rankings, Brand & Crees agree 5 times, Brand & Relton agreed 7 times, and Relton and Crees agreed 15 times. They all three agreed 5 times and all three disagreed 4 times with only 1 "no question about where they deserve to be". i.e. total agreement. It is obvious (?) that the rankings are summed to derive the 'contentious' result, and where there is a *tie*, the band that received the lowest ranking from any adj got the nod. e.g. places 8 & 9. Had they been asked to award the 'traditional points' would the result have been any different.? Maybe not, because Mr Brand's results would still have tilted the 'ledger' as he heard it. One thing is for sure, ...... absolutely nothing. JEREMY P WISE wrote: > The results are as follows: The adjudicators were Brand, Crees and Relton > and I have put their positions in that order. Where on earth is the > consistency here? Brand appears to be the oddball with the other two > agreeing generally. > > 1Brighouse 3 2 4 > 2 Fairies 2 7 2 > 3 JJB 7 3 3 > 4 YBS 13 1 1 > 5 Rothwell 6 4 6 > 6 Fodens 9 5 5 > 7 GUS 5 9 13 > 8 Ever Ready 15 6 8 > 9 Sovereign 12 8 9 > 10 Aveley 4 13 14 > 11 Sellers 20 10 7 > 12 Ransomes 1 20 17 > 13 EYMS 18 11 11 > 14 Wingates 17 12 11 > 15 Woodfalls 16 16 10 > 16 Imps 11 17 15 > 17 Besses 14 14 16 > 18 Redbridge 10 15 19 > 19 Bodmin 8 18 18 > 20 Flowers 19 19 20 > 21 Rhodian 21 21 21 Norm. Music is my first love, after Jan and the billies. -- unsubscribe or receive the list in digest form, mail a message of 'help' to listserver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
[Services] [Contact Us] [Advertise with us] [About] [Tell a friend about us] [Copyright © 2016 NJH Music] |