[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Masters Result - Amazing Facts

To: <brass-band@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Masters Result - Amazing Facts
From: "Bruce Johnson" <orders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 May 1998 09:49:34 +1000
Priority: low
Reply-to: brass-band@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

It would appear that one of the judges certainly heard things differently to
the other two, who on the whole were remarkably consistent. Whilst
recognising that contest adjudications are by nature subjective (and a good
thing too!), it's interesting to speculate on the results if this particular
adjudicator's results are ignored.  The "modified results" are as follows:

1. YBS  (by a considerable margin)
2. Brighouse
3. JJB
4. Fairies
5. Rothwell
6. Fodens
7. Ever Ready
8. Sovereign
9. Sellers
10. GUS
11. EYMS
12. Wingates
13. Woodfalls
14. Aveley
15. Besses
16. Imps
17. Redbridge
18. Bodmin
19. Ransomes
20. Flowers
21. Rhodian

Note: Where the aggregate scores were tied, the band with the highest single
placing was placed higher (ie 2 & 4 beats 3 & 3).

-----Original Message-----
From: JEREMY P WISE <jeremy.wise@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: brass-band@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <brass-band@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, May 26, 1998 3:38 AM
Subject: Re: Masters Result - Amazing Facts


>----------
>> From: Peter Younghusband <monkey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: brass-band@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: Masters Result - Amazing Facts
>> Date: 25 May 1998 15:09
>>
>> Can somebody enlighten me as to how the placings were collated?
>>
>> Was it a case of 1 point for a 1st, 2 for a 2nd etc.....lowest score
>wins?
>>
>
>They simply added up the placings. In the event of a tie, Crees's position
>was the decider. This was drawn on a ballot.
>
>Jeremy
>> Seems as though a few cats have been placed in amongst the aviary again!
>>
>> Monkey
>>
>>
>>
>> Simon Stonehouse wrote:
>>
>> > On Sun, 24 May 1998 20:08:15 +0100, you wrote:
>> >
>> > >Hi again
>> > >
>> > >I've just found out some amazing details.
>> > >
>> > >NSK Ransomes were overall -12th.
>> > >
>> > >Of the three adjudicators G Brand had them 1st, another had them last
>> > >(21st) and the other 17th.
>> > >
>> > >Fodens had 2nd, 2nd and 8th. Ended up 6th.
>> > >
>> > i would guess that last fact can not be true......
>> >
>> > ybs 2 x1st, 1 x13th?
>> >
>> > Fairey's 2 x 2nd, 1x7th
>> >
>> > B&R 2 X 3rd, 1x4th
>> >
>> > thats how i understand it....so far!!
>> >
>> > S
>> >
>> > --
>> > njh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For information about this list, including how
>to
>> > unsubscribe or receive the list in digest form, mail a message of
>'help' to
>> > listserver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>> --
>> unsubscribe or receive the list in digest form, mail a message of 'help'
>to
>> listserver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>--
>unsubscribe or receive the list in digest form, mail a message of 'help' to
>listserver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


--
unsubscribe or receive the list in digest form, mail a message of 'help' to
listserver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Prev by Date: 1998 All England Masters
Next by Date: naked brass(was Local bands)
Previous by thread: Re: Masters Result - Amazing Facts
Next by thread: Re: Masters Result - Amazing Facts
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread