[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Cambridge adjudication

To: brass-band@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Cambridge adjudication
From: Kevin Williams <willi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 21:38:38 +0100
Priority: low
Reply-to: brass-band@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I think you've missed the point here. The Masters is the best organised
contest of the lot so why all the fuss over an adjudication system that
the bands were given the choice to vote for or against - the same that
happens each year for the testpiece. The organisers should be
given credit for trying something different. It's no good whingeing
about it afterwards - you should have voted against it in the first
place if you didn't like it. I don't see your problem - if you get
placed anything above 15th you're almost guaranteed to be invited back
next year anyway. Anyhow, it's all about winning - and none of you would
of managed that under any system !! 

Cheers,
Kev.


--
unsubscribe or receive the list in digest form, mail a message of 'help' to
listserver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cambridge adjudication
  - From: Peter Younghusband

Prev by Date: late news from the masters
Next by Date: Symphonic Sound
Previous by thread: late news from the masters
Next by thread: Re: Cambridge adjudication
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread