[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Debate on Masters results

To: "INTERNET:brass-band@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <brass-band@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Debate on Masters results
From: CRAIG BENNETT <CraigBennett1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 1998 15:12:02 -0400
Priority: low
Reply-to: brass-band@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: CRAIG BENNETT <CraigBennett1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

In response to Alec Gallagher's recent posting on this issue I've been
mulling over the concept of asking the adjudicator (assuming one knows wh=
o
he/she/they are beforehand) what they will be looking for in the winning
performance.

I can't really see the point in this. If all bands did it you could have
22
performances very similar in interpretation thereby taking away the
conductors 'flair'. <Incidentally I enjoy rehearsals where the conductor
tries something new in interpretation/dynamics etc>.

Would appreciate comments from others.

Craig Bennett.


--
unsubscribe or receive the list in digest form, mail a message of 'help' to
listserver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Prev by Date: Re: Anthem - Queen of Australia
Next by Date: Anagrams
Previous by thread: Re: Debate on Masters results
Next by thread: Re: Debate on Masters results
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread