[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Disney Fantasy vs Disney Spectacular

To: brass-band@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Disney Fantasy vs Disney Spectacular
From: Peter <monkey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 17:52:35 +0800
Priority: low
References: <XfDJGDA+9ah1Iw$t@fylde.demon.co.uk>
Reply-to: brass-band@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Tim Morgan wrote:

> OK...I'll be a bit clearer this time. :)  Goff Richards's Disney
> Spectacular is the long awaited sequel to Disney Fantasy.  As the latter
> has formed a staple part of most bands repertoire for the last ten years
> or so, I was wondering whether this new work could live up to the
> standards set by its predecessor!  A bit of light hearted relief if you
> will from the mind numbing threads we've seen recently.  It features Be
> Our Guest and Beauty And The Beast from the cartoon of the same name, A
> Spoonful of Sugar from Mary Poppins, Belle Notte from Lady and the
> Tramp, Bibbidi Bobbidi Boo from Cinderella, A Whole New World from
> Aladdin, and Under The Sea from The Little Mermaid (with optional steel
> pan part).
>
> Hope I've made things clearer :)

Sure have - if it's anything like the first one - should definitely be a crowd
pleaser - and reasonable to play too.

Monkey


--
unsubscribe or receive the list in digest form, mail a message of 'help' to
listserver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

References:
- Re: Disney Fantasy vs Disney Spectacular
  - From: Tim Morgan

Prev by Date: Re: Musical snobbery (was Re: Songs for BL)
Next by Date: Re: Musical snobbery (was Re: Songs for BL)
Previous by thread: Re: Disney Fantasy vs Disney Spectacular
Next by thread: Re: Disney Fantasy vs Disney Spectacular
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread