[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Wick plating

To: brass-band@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Wick plating
From: Angela Tregaskes <angela@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 1998 11:11:19 +0100
In-reply-to: <358F75A6.1486AA9D@cam.ac.uk>
Priority: low
Reply-to: brass-band@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

David Read wrote:

>With several people complaining about Wick mouthpieces having poor
>plating can I make a few points:
>
{snip}
>
>3. Wick gold plating is inferior to standard gold plating. You can
>expect it to wear off very quickly (couple of years?).
>
In my case that is not true ....... I have a DW trombone mouthpiece I've
had for years ..... and it still looks (& feels fine) ....... must have had
it 6 years or more now.

A.T.

==================================================
Angela Tregaskes
P.A. to Professor Trevor G. Smart & Departmental Secretary
Department of Pharmacology & Centre for Toxicology
The School of Pharmacy
University of London
29-39 Brunswick Square
London, WC1N  1AX, U.K.
Tel. 0171-753-5900
Fax. 0171-753-5902
+++++++++++++++++++++


--
unsubscribe or receive the list in digest form, mail a message of 'help' to
listserver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Wick plating
  - From: Steven Booth

References:
- Wick plating
  - From: David Read

Prev by Date: Re: Mouthpieces
Next by Date: Re: Re:War.was Geographic Breakdown
Previous by thread: Wick plating
Next by thread: RE: Wick plating
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread