Some of the contents of the pages on this site are Copyright © 2016 NJH Music | [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: Registration - to be or not to be
The normally perceptive Alec wrote: > I have an even better idea. Abolish all contests. They stifle creativity; What??? Whether I'm planning a contest programme, rehearsing a band, composing a work for competition I'm at my most creative - critical faculties are honed by the comparative/competitive element. > they prove absolutely nothing, because any adjudication in a brass band > contest is necessarily subjective; but not purely subjective. Wrong notes, split notes, out of tune notes, missed entries, incorrect tempi (to an extent) etc.etc. etc. can be measured empirically and weighed in the balance... I'd agree that most adjudicators don't seem to understand this. > they have restricted the repertoire not true for me...when I list my ten favourite pieces and then cross off those composed/commissioned for contests I'm left with only one. The tremendous advances made in the concert repertoire by such as Howarth and Snell were initially inspired by the need to have new music for contests - see Elgar Howarth's book 'What a Performance' (Robson Books 1988 pp154-5) in which he outlines the importance of the Granada Band of the Year contest on shaping his ideas.. > they have restricted the instrumentation; Not necessarily. Where composers have asked for two flugels or four percussionists the rules have changed. Would you argue that the string quartet or the male voice choir has a restricted instrumentation and if so does it matter? P.S. The non-contesting band in the city where I live hasn't a percussionist - they don't perceive the need for the very limited repertoire which they play.... > they have hindered brass bands in > gaining respectability and credibility as a musical medium So why are there competitive elements to nearly every facet of musical life? Do the Leeds Piano Competition or the Cardiff Young Singer of the Year lack musical credibility? (In 1986 I was Lloyds Bank Young Composer of the Year!). > in 99% of cases > they cost the competing band money as do most hobbies and interests. If contests are too expensive for you I suggest you steer well clear of golf or skiing... > they are of absolutely no interest or > consequence to anyone outside of those directly or closely linked with brass > bands but they have consequenses wich are important to very many - new pieces on CD and in concert, high standards of performance... > in short, contests have held brass bands back from the day they were > invented. Since what were invented, bands or contests? Didn't the two arrive at about the same time? (answer - yes!). Brass bands may have survived for nearly 200 years without contests but I'm not sure that I would gamble much money on it and it certainly isn't a risk I'd want to take in the future. > They are utterly futile but an awful lot of people derive considerable pleasure from them. When I asked the band I conduct recently which contests we should attend in coming months the answer from many was 'why can't we enter all of them'. The social side - meeting people from other bands and spending time drinking, relaxing and listening (yes!) with members of your own band - is very important. > > I don't think you're evangelical enough, Andy! > But even Angelical Andy sits on committees which organise contests... Yo David -- unsubscribe or receive the list in digest form, mail a message of 'help' to
|
[Services] [Contact Us] [Advertise with us] [About] [Tell a friend about us] [Copyright © 2016 NJH Music] |