Some of the contents of the pages on this site are Copyright © 2016 NJH Music | [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: 2nd section finals test
Steve Sykes wrote: > I'm having trouble believing that 'Three Figures' has been selected as the > 2nd section Nationals test. ...snip... > This has to be one of the most difficult test pieces ever written (for ANY > grade). It was a British Open test in the early Eighties - very few bands > made any sense of it on that occasion. > Have we really come so far in terms of musicality and technique that this > music is now rated 2nd section??? - I think I'm missing something here ...snip... > - I would have been totally gobsmacked if it had been selected for the 1st > section never mind 2nd! > > Just wait 'til this one is detonated in the bandroom!! > > Any fellow banders who know this work as well as I do - your opinions please! > > What chance 'Benvenuto Cellini' for the third section areas??? I must agree with Steve - this will be a tough nut to crack, both in terms of technique and musicianship. When the choice was announced I listened to the Fodens/Snell recording from '93 and thanked my lucky stars that we didn't qualify - in places even this very worthy combination seems to have difficulty with the shape and direction of the music. I thought it was fairly common understanding that Three Figures was tougher than Howells' other band work, Pagentry, which is still used to test bands at the highest level... David -- unsubscribe or receive the list in digest form, mail a message of 'help' to
|
[Services] [Contact Us] [Advertise with us] [About] [Tell a friend about us] [Copyright © 2016 NJH Music] |