[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Cambridge and B&R!]

To: brass-band@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Cambridge and B&R!]
From: Murray Aitken <murrayaitken@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2 Jun 99 16:29:17 BST
Priority: low
Reply-to: brass-band@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Paul Warder" <jpw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Controversial as ever Martin!
>

> I suppose in the light of our 'result' at Cambridge I can't say too muc
h
> other than:
>

> (i) The separate judges system has once again exposed adjudication to b
e
> little more than guess work aided by the clapometer.

>>>> I don't see how you reach this conclusion. I have just looked at the

results on Mr Big's homepage and with the odd exception think that they a
re
remarkably consistent between the 3 judges.


> (ii) The YBS Rent-a-Crowd treated us to another deafening 5 minute
> performance

>>>> I also heard from various sources that they were fantastic.

> (iii) B&R didn't win AGAIN - Perhaps the bubble has finally burst?

>>>> Aveley and Newham didn't win again - must be because we had wednesda
y
night off to watch the football. However we took comfort from being the
highest placed London band.

Bring back Geoffrey Brand.

Murray Aitken
Aveley and Newham



--

Prev by Date: Re: Fanfare from Carmina Burana
Next by Date: Re: Whit marches
Previous by thread: NZ Army Band and Jack Elliot
Next by thread: Where are are audiences?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread