Some of the contents of the pages on this site are Copyright © 2016 NJH Music | [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: Pedals:'Where it matters
On Sun, 24 Oct 1999 at 17:44:11 +0100, Pete Denton wrote: > On Sat, 23 Oct 1999, Dave Taylor wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Oct 1999, Pete Denton wrote: > It's a long time since I studied physics, but I'd be inclined to > disagree with you there. The 'false' pedals are much stronger and of > totally different physical and aural characteristics than a slightly > bent fundamental (1st harmonic). I am sure it has to be something to > do with 'hearing' a pitch because of the commonality of the harmonics > of that pitch and the harmonics being excited which are native to the > length of tube being used. If it was simply a matter of bending a > fundamental, why does it suddenly become stronger and more sustainable > at a pitch near enough half way between fundamental (1st harmonic) and > 1st overtone (2nd harmonic)? These 5th-down notes (approx) I've seen referred to as "preferred tones" (or is it "privileged"?), and don't pretend to understand why they're "preferred". But the instrument isn't resonating much at those pitches - hence the notes are very bendable and not all that wonderful in tone. It may even be that all we're hearing are harmonics of the presumed pitch. It's well-known that the ear/brain will synthesise a bass note from harmonics: an effect relied upon by organ builders ("Acoustic Bass 32ft", made up of 16ft pipe plus an exact 8 2/3ft one) and cheap-tranny designers alike (I don't suppose the average small radio speaker produces much below middle C - 260Hz - in fact). Neither Britannica nor the Internet produced anything sensible on "preferred tones" or "privileged tones". I remember the TV lecture: the lecturer played the same note on a trombone while moving from 1st to 6th position. Hmm.. Ian --
|
[Services] [Contact Us] [Advertise with us] [About] [Tell a friend about us] [Copyright © 2016 NJH Music] |