Some of the contents of the pages on this site are Copyright © 2016 NJH Music | [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: Masters Test Pieces
-----Original Message----- From: JULIE SANDERSON [mailto:zorba1979@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: 13 January 2000 23:38 To: brass-band@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Masters Test Pieces Sorry, but am I the only one that actually likes BL? I heard Black Dyke play it at the Albert Hall and loved it! Or am I just strange? :-) Julie TRMB "After silence, that which comes nearest to expressing the inexpressible is music." Julie, No, you're not the only one! I thoroughly enjoyed performing it with Brighouse on the same occasion. If I'm honest, though, it was tedious to rehearse - there are so many pieces to what is quite a musical jigsaw. During rehearsals, I just kept trying to think how the acoustics (?!?!?!?!?) of the Royal Albert Hall would probably do it far more justice than the band room... and I feel I was right. I'll also admit to being unable to remember any of the "chewns" (yes, there were some!), but then melody is only one of many elements in music - great or otherwise. If Monkey's honest, he would no doubt admit to finding himself whistling tunes he detests, but finds irresistibly memorable. They do have a habit of popping up at the most inconvenient times, don't they?. I've even sought medical advice to get a certain "chewn," that B&R just HAD to play at every concert, removed from my mental archives (sorry.. just trying to get Martin out of hibernation!). Dare I mention the opinion of an "outsider" in the audience for "Songs for BL"? My brother is certainly not a brass-band fanatic - but he, like me, has always enjoyed listening to a wide range of music. He and his partner were absolutely knocked sideways both by the music and performances of it. He felt parts of it reminded him of Janacek. Whether Elgar Howarth was influenced by that composer I don't know, but I did congratulate EH (coincidentally at the Masters a couple of years ago) on the piece. I, too, am looking forward to rehearsing and performing Contest Music for the Masters, although I am not yet familiar with it. The practice of getting bands to vote for their favourites is to be applauded, but don't let us be drawn to believe that the results prove anything at all about relative merits. Bandspeople, like most people, prefer to stay (given the choice) within a certain "comfort zone." I guarantee that not all those who voted were equally familiar with all the options given. The question of enjoyment of rehearsal is bound to play a huge part in the decision process - and why not? It is a hobby after all. One thing I do object to is when new pieces are first rehearsed and players immediately condemn them as "c..p" or worse. This is the ultimate arrogance, born of ignorance. Somehow, they already seem to know the score inside-out (even though they've never heard it before). Nothing wrong with saying, "I THINK this c...p now, but maybe it'll grow on me. Still nothing wrong (Monkey) with saying - after one, ten, or forty years - "I still think this is c..p." Music isn't, and thankfully never will be, a science. Its subjectivity is - for me - its main attraction John McLoughlin P.S. "George Bernard Shaw would no doubt have said we were "debating the sex (=gender!) of angels." --
|
[Services] [Contact Us] [Advertise with us] [About] [Tell a friend about us] [Copyright © 2016 NJH Music] |