Some of the contents of the pages on this site are Copyright © 2016 NJH Music | [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: David vs Goliath
Although I agree to a certain extent with the comments on contesting, I think it is possible to become a bit too cynical, concentrating too much on the fierce competition between the very top bands, and not on the benefits accrued by hundreds of lower section bands for whom contesting is the only real means by which to improve. Those who criticise contesting must concede that it is more enjoyable to play in a band where every player pays close attention to intonation, rhythm, style, note lengths, phrasing, balance, etc., than in a band which blasts through music with no consideration as to musical quality. Intense concentration on musical performance is instilled through preparation for a contest, where the same piece of music is rehearsed in so much detail that the band learns to use its collective ears! Dissenters may argue that the same attention should be applied in the preparation of each and every concert programme, but this is impractical and extremely time-consuming. In any case, the public are far less discerning as listeners than your average adjudicator. At a typical local band concert, most of the audience are happy to hear a tune they recognise or to which they know the words. To the vast majority, wrong notes, poor intonation etc. are hardly noticed. Let's not forget that brass bands are not the only groups who compete against each other. In Edinburgh last Sunday, my family attended the Scottish Choir of the Year Competition. The standard of singing was exceptional, and it was interesting to note that the choir's contest repertoire is very different to their normal concert repertoire, mirroring the difference between brass band test-pieces and concert items. Cameron Mabon --
|
[Services] [Contact Us] [Advertise with us] [About] [Tell a friend about us] [Copyright © 2016 NJH Music] |