Some of the contents of the pages on this site are Copyright © 2016 NJH Music | [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: new test pieces
In message <NCBBJOLMNLDBKAHFGDHDKEFBDHAA.gas@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Gordon A Simpson <gas@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes >Maybe it's time that a panel of top percussionists sat down with composers >(a the composition stage) to discuss what is and isn't possible with 3 >players. Composers in years gone by have relied heavily on brass band >specialists to score the piece (e.g. Moorside Suite, Severn Suite, Diadem of >Gold, etc) so why should we expect that the current crop of composers will >fully understand percussion writing. That's a slight non sequitur - brass bands aren't the only ensembles to use assorted percussion. Also, band pieces of the Elgar/Holst era are minimal at most in the percussion department, leaving very little room for more advanced/intriguing effects. The reason these composers left the scoring to 'natives' (if they did at all - when The Severn Suite was used for the open a couple of years ago there was an article by Bram Gay(? I think) in the Bandsman making a persuasive case for Elgar having scored it himself) was that they didn't feel competent enough to score expertly for an unfamiliar medium. Or, more cynically, that they felt that they get away doing the smaller amount of work required for the same commission. A further point - of all the adjustable skills required for converting to band scoring, percussion writing is by far the most tranferrable; it's almost safe just to write them as for full orchestra or other comparable ensemble. I've seen several transcriptions where the percussion parts have simply been photocopied from the original, while the band parts have had to be completely rewritten. Dave Taylor
|
[Services] [Contact Us] [Advertise with us] [About] [Tell a friend about us] [Copyright © 2016 NJH Music] |