[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Moor of Venice revisited

To: <brass-band@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Moor of Venice revisited
From: "Mike Lyons" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 22:49:45 -0000
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <NDBBJKAEOLFLPDNFCBMNKEBFCJAA.rodg@globalnet.co.uk>

Hi all,

Unfortunately, the errata listed do not cover all of the notation errors and
the comment about interpretation leaves a lot of room for doubt as to the
accuracy of other markings - either on the score or parts!

How free an interpretation can you put into it?
What happens when you and the adjudicator disagree on an 'interpretation'?
Please don't misinterpret my remarks here. I'm not knocking the piece. I
actually quite like it. However, I would definitely NOT want to adjudicate!

Mike


--

References:
- RE: Moor of Venice revisited
  - From: Rod Gibson

Prev by Date: Re: BBW Rankings
Next by Date: Re: BBW Rankings
Previous by thread: RE: Moor of Venice revisited
Next by thread: BFBB Site
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread