Some of the contents of the pages on this site are Copyright © 2016 NJH Music | [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: Cambridge - Judges positioning
Has anyone thought that the three judges were sat in different parts of the hall and could hear different sounds ? Having listened from different sectors of the hall there was definitiely a bias from various sections dependent upon where I was seated. -----Original Message----- From: Tim Morgan <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: brass-band@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <brass-band@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 26 May 1998 18:44 Subject: Re: Cambridge - 'right bands in the wrong order ?' >In message <01bd87c2$48ec68e0$0100007f@localhost>, kraken ><kraken@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes >>>Contests finally became a joke today. Arguably any of the top six could >>>have won, but in practice to win a contest you need to be lucky with ALL >>>three judges. >> >>Got to disagree there - luck has nothing to do with it you have to PLEASE >>all 3 judges - what's the point having 3 if you only want to take 2 into >>account? > >Actually, luck now DOES play an important role in the new system. The >tie break judge is decided by a random draw. Eric Crees was selected, >and as a result, we tied for 8th with Ever Ready, they got 8th and we >got 9th...had Geoffrey Brand been selected instead, these two results >would have been the other way round. Regardless of all the advantages >of this new system, it is now true that there is a totally random >element to the brass band contest. > >-- >Tim Morgan, Bass Trombone, Woolley Pritchard Sovereign Brass. >http://www.fylde.demon.co.uk/sov/sov.htm > > >-- >unsubscribe or receive the list in digest form, mail a message of 'help' to >listserver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- unsubscribe or receive the list in digest form, mail a message of 'help' to listserver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
[Services] [Contact Us] [Advertise with us] [About] [Tell a friend about us] [Copyright © 2016 NJH Music] |